9/18/2023 0 Comments New fuji full frameA full frame sensor has a 1.0x crop factor, and the industry standard for focal lengths is in the full frame/35mm standard because of this. You’ll note that the chart in the opening section also shows the various crop factors associated with the size of the relative sensors. While the image circle is smaller than the Hasselblad 53.4 x 40mm sensor, it is still considerably bigger than any full frame image circle, and the lens mount diameter reflects that. This means that medium format lenses are going to be bigger than comparative Sony full frame lenses as a matter of course, because they start at nearly a 66% larger diameter. The front opening of lenses changes according to the focal length and aperture combination, but the rear diameter at the mount is consistent. The Sony full frame -Emount is 46.1mm in diameter by comparison, closer to the APS-C size than the massive medium format dimensions. The Fuji X-mount (APS-C) is 44mm is diameter the GF mount is a whopping 76.5mm in diameter. If you are unfamiliar with medium format and know Fuji more for X-mount, prepare to be shocked by how huge the mount size actually is. Full HD 1080p Video Recording at 30 fps.Here’s a breakdown of the basic features of the camera:: Fujifilm GFX50S II Build, Handling, and Features As always, this is a completely independent review and my findings are entirely my own. Thanks to Fujifilm Canada for providing me the loaner of the cameras and lenses to do this review. You can watch my long format video review, quick video review, or just keep reading…įollow Me Patreon | My Newsletter | Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px Yes, the larger sensor does bring some real advantages (as we’ll explore), but as a camera system it is still very primitive when compared to its feature-rich brethren.Īre you a candidate for Fuji’s medium format alternative to the traditional full frame route? Join me as we explore this rather complicated topic. The price of the R5 is pretty similar to the 50S II, so it is natural to draw comparisons between these systems…and not just the ones that Fuji wants you to. My other main camera is the Canon EOS R5 with a similar 45MP resolution. This is never truer than with the GFX50S II, which shares the 50MP resolution point with my Sony Alpha 1 that is my “daily driver” but is actually considerably cheaper. Fujifilm entered the space as a disrupter and began marketing their medium format cameras as alternatives to full frame. Both the incredible prices and the incredible image quality made medium format the exclusive domain of well-heeled professionals. Medium format has always been fairly inaccessible, and it was understood that there were a lot of serious compromises/challenges to using the systems (One of my subscribers on YouTube mentioned that his long term rental Phase One medium format back had one!!! focal point in its autofocus “system”. The cameras were extremely expensive (often tens of thousands of dollars) and weren’t really compared to other systems. The medium format market is very much a niche market, and in the past the major players in the space (Hasselblad, Phase One, and Leica) were largely content to keep it as an exclusive club. One significant challenge for Fuji, however, is that in some ways they have painted themselves into a corner. That’s a lot of savings, obviously, but at the end of the day the fact that the GFX100S is essentially better at everything and only $2000 more may the most compelling argument against the GFX50S II. This combo of two existing systems allowed them to offer the GFX50S II for $2000 less than the GFX100S. The formula is simple: Fuji took the sensor from the older GFX50R and put it into the new body of the GFX100S. Though the price tag of $4000 USD isn’t cheap in an absolute sense, in medium format terms this is a bargain basement price – you could buy 2.5 of these for the same price as the GFX-100. The Fujifilm GFX50S II that I’m reviewing today fills a different niche – a truly affordable (in medium format terms) camera that gives potential full frame camera customers an alternative. I saw details from my test chart that I had simply never seen before. While I didn’t love the ergonomics of that camera or its autofocus system, I was blown away by the image quality. The last time I was reviewing Fujifilm’s medium format lineup was with their extremely high resolution and extremely high-priced Fujfilm GFX 100 camera body and its incredible 102 megapixels of resolution along with two lenses, the slightly older GF 45mm F2.8 WR and the brand new GF 80mm F1.7 WR short telephoto lens.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |